In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
It is common knowledge that famine is an intricate conundrum. Despite recent breakthroughs and heavy investment in agriculture, poverty and hunger continue to persist around the world. Possible causes and potential solutions of such a seemingly paradoxical matter would be elaborated in this essay.
To commence with, there are various factors that engender this enigma. Primarily, a booming population poses increasingly growing demands that go beyond what is feasible for farming advancements. The global human community is expanding more than ever, inducing inflated food demands on a large scale. Agriculture and rural development is woefully outpaced by that of the world population. What is more, the current issue of uneven food distribution among different regions also augments the matter. Due to climatic, financial and political complications, proportions of the global agricultural output in different countries hang in the balance. As a result, some areas are heavily burdened with famine despite improvements in agricultural harvest.
Despite such a bleak reality, viable measures can be implemented to alleviate the situation. First and foremost, family planning policies ought to be enforced to curb the rampant population growth. Specific guidelines and penalties need to be introduced, while mass educational campaigns are conducted to raise public awareness of the matter. It is also advisable for nations to put more emphasis on issues of international significance including politics and diplomacy. Countries can arrange agreements concerning food import and financial aid, as well as transferring agricultural technology to enhance crop output in arid areas. Food disproportion can therefore be ameliorated to ensure nourishment, both qualitatively and quantitatively.
To encapsulate, while food shortages are not necessarily mitigated by headway in agricultural production due to the perpetual overpopulation and the disproportionate food allocation, the matter can be overcome with appropriate family planning and optimal international relation policies. Drastic measures need to be implemented to relieve people from the torment of hunger for the sake of a better future world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, as a result, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.928125 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31485617854 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621875 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9749407847 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.388888889 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178652724053 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493922633136 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307591581646 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103285625296 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00610709551901 0.056905535591 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 50.2224549098 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.