Students today can easily access information online, so libraries are no longer necessary. Do you agree or disagree?
There have been many people believe that libraries are not of a paramount importance anymore as youngsters now have had the abilities to gain access to the online sources of information. I partly agree with this view.
On the one hand, the studying method using technology development has brought some considerable benefits to some extent. Firstly, young generation is allowed to gain real and valuable experience thanks to the breakthrough in online storing and providing information. For example, It is accessible and easy for people to discover the difficulties of transgender models in Thailand just via some videos about them on the Internet. Secondly, the youths could access the world of knowledge easily with the help of online tools. It can be seen that some websites are already designed with friendly-used searching equipments so that students can sift information as quickly as possible.
On the other hand, libraries still play an integral part in studying career. One reason is that libraries have allowed students to be given the countless opportunities to strengthen their relationships.
Students have been more inclined to work in groups in the libraries to complete their assignments together. As a consequence, the students who have achieved many high-scoring accomplishments could also deliver the academic knowledge to the ones who fall behind with their studies, which would definitely result in the enhancement in their relations. Another outstanding reason which should be considered thoroughly is that some priceless pieces of information could be only found in libraries. In my experience, top-tier institutions in Vietnam have been fully-equipped with reference libraries, which are able to store thousands of gifted findings. If a person has a dissertation on these special topics, he certainly can not rely on anything online.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that online development have benefited students efficiently in terms of online information but this by no means decreases the importance of libraries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50316455696 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13638568384 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579113924051 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3767376628 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.933333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167472491746 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054391046997 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423094693059 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897878736124 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142210329222 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.