It seems tourists are the only visitors of historical places and museums as compared to locals who rarely visit such ancient sites. The essay explains the reasons why historical places fail to attract the attention of locals and what solutions it provides to improve the situation.
To begin with. There are several reasons behind this trend. The main factor is that people living in the region have spent much of their life there. So they are pretty much aware of the history of the place and there is nothing new for them to experience while everything about the place is a fresh experience for tourists. Another factor that may provoke such disinterest in local residents is historical places themselves. They are poorly conserved owing to failure in allocating some budget for renovation. For example, Chogha Zanbil is one of the remarkable ancient monument in Iran which relegates no consideration and many people of the same area may not be aware of its existence. Therefore, only very few tourist come to visit the site not locals.
However, to tackle the problem, officials need to generate a renewed interest in people by holding festivals in remembrance of the big historical event of the place. They could also use promotion methods like ticket discount or free entry to encourage more locals to visit the place. Besides, it isn’t the only duty of museum administrators to keep these valuable treasures safe but also add more attractions to the site by redecorating the building or rearranging the artifacts. Different methods or techniques should be implemented to add more colour to such ancient reserves. For example, both psychologists and sociologists, who have adequate information about the culture and behavior of society, can recommend useful tips to promote the number of local residents to visit the places.
In conclusion, although tourists have much more enthusiasm than locals, it’s possible to provide such motivation in locals. This not only raise awareness of individuals about their local culture but also provide funds for restoration.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20597014925 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78543773928 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573134328358 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4880609262 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.588235294 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.82352941176 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352216684109 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0949986766405 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0671625097766 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208805192485 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854486424134 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.