It is argued by people consider that plethora of skills are improved by working in team group than own efforts. I partially agree with given this assertion and my supporting arguments along with the rationales thereof are discussed in the following body paragraph.
There are multifarious benefits of working together. First and foremost, communication skills are increased by it. In group, people stay to connected touch with distinct aptitudes of masses. They meet with masses who speaks different languages, who belongs to another culture. For instance, they can interact with them and can improve their communicate skills. Moreover, mental and intellectual skills can develop with working in group team. If they will do activities with their team members then they will share their thoughts in front of other.
Introducing with different thoughts civilians can acquire other information, like about their business, activity and so on.
On the other hand, there are many advantages of working alone. To commence with, working by alone a person will be able to find that what his/her weakness, so that they could improve their weak points. Secondly, this is good opportunity for masses to try new experience. With a single work.a person can develop their self confidence and solve problems by themselves.
In conclusion, it is apparent from above discussion that working by together teach the value of cooperate while single working provides good opportunity to learn their difficulties by themselve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 443, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...can develop with working in group team. If they will do activities with their team...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41101694915 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75543324751 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.618644067797 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8584498127 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.1333333333 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163439929969 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554131697172 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446925773674 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883381707169 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394316199491 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.