There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home. This is because the computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper. Do you think it is a positive of negative development?
In recent years, these has been a growing trend toward distance learning among students and workers. While some people consider it toxic because it takes away people’s face-to-face interaction, for other it is a chance to improve their situation and this is where I lay my thoughts.
Since studying from home reduce time spending in commuting, students and workers can save a lot of time and work more productively. This is because accessible technology allows people to work flexibly at anytime, anywhere that they can find to be the most effective. Therefore, People can organize their own schedule every day and as a result, they can do their job, spent time with their family, exercise and have enough rest.
Another benefit of accessible technology is that it could open the door for people from low socioeconomic areas to change their life. Many prestigious universities around the world offer free courses on academic platform for everyone to access meaning that many people from the high mountains or remote area can acquire knowledge to make a living from the new skills. Online learning platform are giving people the chance to improve their situation.
That is not to say that distance learning not have any negative effect on students and workers. The internet is a home for not only knowledge, but also many other temptations. This mean that online learner’s concentration would be broken leading to poorer academic performance. But still, distance learning would benefit for individuals, especially for those who cannot access to expensive courses.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 47, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[2]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...s not to say that distance learning not have any negative effect on students and wor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, therefore, while, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25296442688 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78144064597 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612648221344 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.275923509 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188287161378 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654275260238 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759325998723 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0994305983986 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629152610394 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.