These days, mobile phones and the internet are very important to the ways in which people relate to one another socially.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, internet and mobile phones are very necessary for such ways in which pupils attach to one other socially. I think there are more advantages rather than disadvantages. I will discuss about in the upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, there are some merits for this view which are described in the following paragraphs. First of all, due to technology, it can be seen that in such areas is developing and also there are a great deal of masses using many social apps like whatsapp, instagram, snapchat and so on. With the help of this type of apps people easily interect with other people as well as they easily make a good friend and their they do spend time with their friends through video calls and audio calls as well as chat with their friends.
Moving further, with the help of internet and mobile phones they play online games with their friends. For instance, PUBG game is very popular in some countries and this trend is increasing day by day as well as people play this games in one teamm and there are four persons involve in this team. Moreover, people can easily communicate with other persons and also share their feelings, emotions, ideas and opinions.
However, there are some demerits for this development. Firstly, these days people are over depended on internet and mobile phones. Therefore, they do not communicate with their family members as well as family gap is also increasing. Secondly, sometimes some friends are fake on internet so that is why they can harm the other people.
To sum up, there are more advantages as compare to disadvantages. If people can less use of internet then they should make a better life on earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 209, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
...s developing and also there are a great deal of masses using many social apps like w...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, i think, as well as, first of all, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1384.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82229965157 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44618659706 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526132404181 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9489470601 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1333333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226925813235 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783504007873 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745647205629 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138361397413 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602969993836 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.