In today’s world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot?
In today's life, with the advancement of science and technology are affecting every aspect of life, people working in the field of arts such as musicians, painters and writers still gain a great deal of attention. This is because arts can teach us a number of things about life that we can learn from science and technology.
Many forms of art, especially music, can deliver messages about the appreciation of we have in life as well as close the gap between people in the world. Hundreds of musical works depict misery, misfortune and sorrow that still always exist in life and this sends a strong message to those who have been suffering from unhappiness. " We are the world", for example, which is composed by Micheal Jackson and Lionel Richie, this lyrics to remind each of us of our responsibility to the world and fellow human beings and condolences to about a million of people who died in the famine, especially children. I believe that there are not any technologies in the world that could manage to convey such a powerful message.
Another point about the benefit of arts is that while scientific and technological developments can help people to improve their physical lives, arts have a mission to nurture human mental health. Work of arts such as performance and music convey lots of precious meanings in life, which helps people release after working, including reducing the risk of depression. For instance, whenever I felt down and depressed, I often listen to playful kinds of music which always gives me positive emotions and a belief that I can do anything as long as I put my heart into it. I think that we hardly ever have these feelings when we carry out a scientific research or a technological project.
In conclusion, for the aforementioned reasons, I believe that we can learn valuable things in the world of arts that we can not acquire in the world of science and technology.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82727272727 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7250647628 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.720148733 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.818181818 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382213887194 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144831035891 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0972437242637 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253911701939 0.151304729494 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118877788231 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.33 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.