in today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. what can arts tell us about life that science and technology can not
We are living in the state of digital community when sciences and technologies have got far more futher steps and tended to harness the world’s destiny. We still consider the fundamental roles of artists such as musicians, painters and writers. In fact, their work create such a distict impact to our lifestyle.
Needless to say, both developed and developing nations truly priority the influences of sciences and technologies because of the profound effects. Human life has been more flexible due to facilitating of many inventions and artificial intelligience applications. Sciences and technologies directly consider a problem basing on their one-side view through studies and researchings so that they are always deep into discovering something new. Otherwise, the development of new-cutting edges does not mean to keep people connect well.
In contrast, artists who have a mission to nurture human mental health and to shape the beauty innerself. We easily enjoy a masterpiece or a performing art which inspire us a lots of meaning in life while we hardly access to have true love with wealth and mordern stuffs. Next, work of arts is the consequence of multiple viewa in one issue. For instance, abtracts art is a special aspect we can observe with our direct vision without any anylization. Therefore, arts make us more creative, sympathy and obtaining conprehension. Because of that, artists contribute to heighten the value of humanity, unity and people’s contact while sciences and technologies sometime create the detriment of human’s right and to expand the gap between the rich and the poor worldwide.
In short, we should believe that art is an indespencible part of our life’s quality. Buiding up a better world would rather reservethe advantages of heritages as well as kepp the advanced sciences and technologies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 173, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
...ce or a performing art which inspire us a lots of meaning in life while we hardly acce...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the advanced sciences and technologies.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in contrast, in fact, in short, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31506849315 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98273319567 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650684931507 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9095583721 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.466666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336252955291 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877931088772 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485202077365 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182177150484 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479070455089 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.