The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts

Essay topics:

The tradition that family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts

In modern society, families rarely have meals together with all the members, gathering at the same time. This relative lifestyle has several drawbacks and we will take a close look at this issue to figure out why this is happening and what the negative consequences are.

There are various reasons that lead to frequently being absent in family meals of each family member. Firstly, in the modern setting, men and women who are involved so much in their careers and social communities. For instance, with the drinking culture in Asia countries, Asians often spend their time, discussing about their work, signing a contracts or enhancing their sense of communities out of working time in restaurants or beer clubs. This relatively busy lifestyle does not allow them to have meals with their families. Moreover, because of family expectations, Adolescents now have to study too much, concerned about their academic performances. Besides eight hours on official schools, their parents also send them to the extra classes in the evening or the languages classes in the weekend. As a result, these youngsters miss out of eating with their families.

As the reasons above, there are several harmful effects of not frequently cooking together. The truth is that teenagers are the most negatively affected by this lifestyle. According to studies, the young persons who do not share meals with their families are likely to be depressed and experience bad relationship with their household as well as their friends. Furthermore, planning meals, preparing foods and learning up are things that these teens will not have change to experience without cooking together as family. In addition, fast foods provided away from home are less nutrient and contain more fat and sugar which are responsible for range of health issues such as: obesity and heart failure.

In conclusion, with the impacts of modern behaviors, family meals have been disappearing. And this way of life is the key factors influencing population mentally and physically.

Votes
Average: 9.5 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... what the negative consequences are. There are various reasons that lead to f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a contract' or simply 'contracts'?
Suggestion: a contract; contracts
...e, discussing about their work, signing a contracts or enhancing their sense of communities...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s out of eating with their families. As the reasons above, there are several ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 431, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to up'
Suggestion: to up
...ing meals, preparing foods and learning up are things that these teens will not ha...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as: obesity and heart failure. In conclusion, with the impacts of moder...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24846625767 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68510759145 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616564417178 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3237916965 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.9375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161552801134 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535549007705 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650217386781 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104080594013 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342856886884 0.056905535591 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.