The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate changes made to the road access to a city hospital in two years, 2007 and 2010.
In general, it is obvious that there were more constructed added for public transport and an additional way to reach the hospital was also added.
The city hospital was surrounded by a circular road named King Road. In 2007, the tree-lined Hospital Road was the only viable road to get to the hospital through the south end. Directly to the east of this street was the car park for both the staff and public usage. In addition, there was a separated bus stop to the east of the entire area.
After 3 years, a remarkable transformation took place. The Hospital Road was cleared of trees and two roundabouts were put at its junctions with Ring Road and City Road. The car park to the east was also made available for only staff, as new public parking space was opened right to the east to the hospital. The bus station was located to the west of Hospital Road and could be accessed via turnings at both roundabouts on Hospital Road. Another roundabout was also installed far away from the area and to the southeast of the hospital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ened right to the east to the hospital. The bus station was located to the west of...
^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he east to the hospital. The bus station was located to the west of Hospital Road...
^^
Line 7, column 367, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was located to the west of Hospital Road and could be accessed via turnings at bo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 205.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57073170732 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43074692976 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 176.041082164 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526829268293 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 506.74238477 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8766468216 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.1818181818 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6363636364 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19216251624 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934496100588 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111040557283 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161470602213 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120086608762 0.056905535591 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 78.4519038076 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.