University should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, it is not uncommon to see companies recruit equal amount of males and females because they will be offered a lower tax revenue in many countries. This situation might be a symbol of gender quality, but should academic institutions like universities also obey this kind of criteria? From my point of view, I cannot completely agrees with this statement, albeit to certain advantages that it might have, and let me illustrate my perspective as follows.
To begin with, there is no doubt that colleges should enroll the same number of male and female students if they share the absolutely equal academic backdrop. What I'm trying to say is that it is unjustifiable for schools to reject the students because of their gender in an oversimplified way if these students have the same level of learning ability like others. For example, some professors might think that a girl is not suitable for scientific study and offer a rejection letter, and this action should definitely be banned. Briefly, it is totally acceptable to accept equal male and female students with the same learning capability.
Nevertheless, it is inevitable to for universities to accept different numbers of students according to their personal interests. To be specific, some subjects like sports and engineering are more likely to attract male students, while other disciplines related to liberal arts appear to be more ubiquitous in female groups. In this occasion, the applications received by various colleges vary from individual to individual so it is unrealistic for every course to enroll equal male and female students.
For another angle, emphasizing the gender equality too much could be another gender discrimination to some extent. For instance, some college might focus less on the academic qualification of female students because they classify females as vulnerable groups and should be treat differently. In other words, they underestimate women's learning abilities unconsciously, and these situations could be classifies as discrimination upon women either. To sum up, it is unreasonable for colleges to accept equal male and female student due to their biases.
In conclusion, I think that universities are supposed to enroll students according to their learning abilities and academic backgrounds instead of gender differences, and the equal numbers only appears accidentally. There is also an old saying in China 'Nothing is absolutely fair'.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | tatadaigia | 22 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | Skhanuman1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | wIsaac | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | nguyen thi thu hien | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | nguyen thi thu hien | 56 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...bsolutely equal academic backdrop. What Im trying to say is that it is unjustifiab...
^^
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'treated'?
Suggestion: treated
...ales as vulnerable groups and should be treat differently. In other words, they under...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, if, nevertheless, so, while, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, in other words, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 384.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3828125 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01226222083 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0355907314 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.1875 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29828233978 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103485640185 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761794115551 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162643551818 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533856629944 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.