Visual pollution is the major cause of accident on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Visual pollution is more poisonous than any other pollution because it kills soul. Visual pollution is an aesthetic issue and refers to the impact of pollution that impairs one's ability to enjoy a vista or view. The given topic asserts that, is visual pollution key reason behind accidents on roads? I completely agree with this point.
To embark with, visual pollution disturbs the visual area of people by creating harmful changes in natural enviornment. Billboard on the roadsand advertisement are also examples of visual pollution. An incident happened in America where forty-eight cars went through accident because of a car distracted by advertisements on billboards. Moreover, open storage of trash is another reason for distraction. A survey was conducted in India which revealed many accidents that occur in developing countries due to open storage trash.
A building that is made of glass can reflect sunlight, which is dangerous for the people driving by. Depression, stress and anxiety due to bad circumstances followed by visual pollution also coauses accident. Visual pollution has several effects such as; distraction, eye fatigue, decrease in opinion diversity and loss of identity. Visual pollution ruins the asthetic appeal of a specified area. Visual pollution occurs when an individual cannot enjoy the view in particular area due to negative changes in a natural enviornment.
As we have seen that there are number of anwers to this question. On balance however, I tend to believe that government should execute some laws to avoid accidents due to visual pollution such as baning of billboards on areas like highways etcetera.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...to the impact of pollution that impairs ones ability to enjoy a vista or view. The g...
^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rtisements on billboards. Moreover, open storage of trash is another reason for d...
^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he asthetic appeal of a specified area. Visual pollution occurs when an individual can...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ve changes in a natural enviornment. As we have seen that there are number of a...
^^
Line 7, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'highways'' or 'highway's'?
Suggestion: highways'; highway's
...h as baning of billboards on areas like highways etcetera.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, in particular, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37307692308 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85630984264 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626923076923 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.731419997 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4375 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225309549941 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772409645244 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495967921093 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143334080211 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521683999525 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.