It is argued that, In times of natural calamities, Rich countries should provide help to developing countries. I completely agree with this statement as wealthy countries have abundant resources to help and this would also help establishing a better relation with each other in future.
First of all, Developed countries have scores of lastest equipments and bulk of finances to support unwealthy countries. Wealthy nations can provide aid during disasters like floods, t-sunami and earthquakes by assisting them with medication , food and even shealter for some period of time as refugees in rich nations. For instance, During the earthquake disaster in Syria , Rich country like canada and gave them citizen-ship as refugees. Thus, the death rate can be reduced to tens.
Secondly, Healthy relation can be built by helping each other during awful timeperiods and it will be remembered for longtime by poor ones and will enhance their bond in long terms and it will serve as an example of existence of humanity. However, rich countries also have some benifits of aiding needy countries. For instance, India helped Afganistan, in problem caused by tornado with medical faclities for injuries in man power though, this led to declaring of various positive agreements and Afganistan reduced 5% tax on goods imported by india. That's why, helping one in need can develop better relationships between countries.
In conclusion, Assistance should be provided by prosperous countries to unwealthy nations because they can effortlessly do that with help of resources avalible in huge manner and their relation will get better in long run.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to establish' or 'establish'.
Suggestion: to establish; establish
...ources to help and this would also help establishing a better relation with each other in fu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 276, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...shing a better relation with each other in future. First of all, Developed countries h...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 242, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...quakes by assisting them with medication , food and even shealter for some period ...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ation , food and even shealter for some period of time as refugees in rich nations. For instan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ood and even shealter for some period of time as refugees in rich nations. For in...
^^
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... During the earthquake disaster in Syria , Rich country like canada and gave them ...
^^
Line 5, column 551, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...uced 5% tax on goods imported by india. Thats why, helping one in need can develop be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1380.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3488372093 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78334012448 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608527131783 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.1079757882 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.454545455 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22253165024 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834301778086 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708167262015 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149390929867 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620907922707 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.