Many people believe that employers should not focus only on qualifications and experience as fundamental criteria while recruiting employees, alternatively they should pay more attention to their personal qualities. In my belief, I completely agree with the given opinion.
Finding a job is one of the most difficult things due to the requirements required by employers, which is often high qualifications and long experience. And because of this, many fresh graduated students, although they have talents, energy, and high personal qualities struggle in finding a job since they do not have any experience or their qualification does not fit the requirements. I personally have experienced that, once I completed my study at university I applied for a job but they did not even accept my application because I do not have at least one year of experience, even though I confidently believe that I deserve the job and I can do better than many people who were accepted because of their experience.
However, big companies, especially in the IT field such as Google and Facebook, stopped looking for high qualifications, and instead of focus on the candidates' diploma or which university they graduated from, they started asking for personal qualifications and soft skills. And currently, you can find engineers and programers with low or even no qualification working in Google, Facebook, and many other companies.
In conclusion, the current system of recruiting has prevented many young energetic people from finding the job that can apply their energy in it, which is definitely a loss for both employees and companies. Finally, I hope this system will change and employers will pay more attention to personal qualities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... However, big companies, especially in the IT field such as Google and Facebook, stop...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fields'?
Suggestion: fields
...er, big companies, especially in the IT field such as Google and Facebook, stopped lo...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'candidates'' or 'candidate's'?
Suggestion: candidates'; candidate's
...ifications, and instead of focus on the candidates diploma or which university they gradua...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, so, while, at least, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29818181818 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12420568417 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0195700827 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.888888889 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5555555556 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211384272956 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980277115743 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0772393657647 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149855934889 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102676213734 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.