Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the past 50 years, the issue of whether or not endangered species should be protected from extinction has been a contentious one. Whereas some people may consider it as a drain on national resources, it is my personal belief that those animals deserve careful preservation. The principle reasons for this are as follows.
First and foremost, it is an irrefutable fact that biodiversity helps maintain a balanced ecosystem since the disappearance or introduction of a species would have an adverse effect on the whole ecosystem. In other words, if a single species should become extinct, the whole/entire food chain will be disrupted, affecting various species of flora and fauna, which finally poses a threat to humans’ life. A salient instance is that when there are few predators, grasshoppers can develop on a large scale, which will shortly turn into a locust outbreak, negatively affecting farmers’ crops.
Equally importantly, it would be superficial not to appreciate the crucial role played by differing animals. To embark on, humans rely heavily on crops and agricultural plants for a variety of purposes, ranging from food to economy and thus, if it weren’t for insects’ pollination, we wouldn’t be able to have a bumper crop until now. As a result, crop growth can suffer when such pollen-carrying insects as butterflies, bees, birds and so on are reduced to extinction.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that animals in danger must be preserved from becoming extinct. Not only do they balance the whole ecosystem, but they also have an important role to play in our daily lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
Over the past 50 years, the issue of whether or not endangered species should be protected ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
..., negatively affecting farmers’ crops. Equally importantly, it would be superficial no...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, may, so, thus, whereas, as a result, in other words, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1368.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14285714286 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99913304601 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676691729323 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.233544022 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.363636364 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0596205270969 0.244688304435 24% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0208294538143 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0182375141786 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0376532744655 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193954544934 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.