Due to the rapid advancement in technology the world has become a global village. It is considered by some individuals that the social network and chat groups on internet are the best source to meet strangers while, others opine that face to face communication is much better than online. I disagree with this notion. In my opnion, social media is more convenient for individuals as well as helpful in creating friendly and better relation with aliens.
There are multifarious benefits of using public network. To begin with, individuals can get the chance to meet with new friends by using facebook, chat groups, Twitter and any other sites to share their ideas, opinions and problems with anothers to get a better solution which is regarding to their study subjects, business and personal matters. In addition, humans can boost their level of confidence as well as communication skills because of opt by these sites. For instance, video call and massanger are becoming popular among younsters which is fruitful to escalate the good relations between individuals.
Moreover, social sites plays an integral role to bringing people close together. By using these sites, youngsters are able to learn the different culture, language and tradition of a foreign nations when they interact with unknown. Furthermore, social connections are always encourage the managers to bring something new and better product in the market. Also, these connections with community are useful for the expansion of any business. Entrepreneur can use these sites to aware the public about new commodities to make the image in the market.
However, face to face communication is preferred by human beings because of certain reasons. Firstly, frauds are increasing day by day on these sites which are unable to provide an appropriate information to humans. Innocent people are easily caught by these sites because they are not understand the intention of other individuals. Secondly, families are greatly affected by this and social bondings are not much present in the contemporary era. People are became addictive of these sites and thus less socially in some cases and the fraud relationship put a great influence on society and also on individuals.
To sum up, every arguments has two sides. So, online networking and chat groups has both pros and cons. But with the enhacing techo era, the demand of such sites are umpteen and the drawbacks of websites can be improved by taking some ideal steps.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'nation'?
Suggestion: nation
...re, language and tradition of a foreign nations when they interact with unknown. Furthe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
...thermore, social connections are always encourage the managers to bring something new and...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 287, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'understood'.
Suggestion: understood
...ght by these sites because they are not understand the intention of other individuals. Sec...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, as well as, in some cases, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2086.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18905472637 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72314786028 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569651741294 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6141012698 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.19047619048 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212791591497 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05582764899 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476050541083 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109241162547 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045037443914 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.