Technology and automation are improving day by day and these developments affect peoples’ lives in both good and bad ways. Decreasing of demand for manual labour are considered one of the main results of this trend. However, I agree with this idea to some extent and I will support my opinion with examples.
First of all, it can be seen that robots and automation manufactures are developed well in recent years. For this reason, employers tend to use robots instead of humans. Working with robots is easier and cheaper way of business. They do not demand any salary or vacancy, and they are more effective and quicker than people. For example, machines can do a difficult work for an hour while human beings need days to handle it. In this case, it is extremely useful to take an advantage of technology instead of employing people for high salaries.
In other words, this improvement helps workers to sharpen on other kinds of works which can not be done by artificial intelligence. What I mean by this, there are some tasks which can not be handled by robots and need human brain or creativity. In other words, it can increase the ratio of time and work in all manufacture sections.
In other hand, if members of society lose their job, it means that they can lose their happiness. Whole frame time we need money and this fashion can cause huge problems about financial situations.
In conclusion, if advances on technology and automation fields are used cleverly, it can cause revolution in industry and manufacture
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and work in all manufacture sections. In other hand, if members of society los...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, i mean, in conclusion, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84732824427 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65472214678 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.1025011682 49.4020404114 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21347622504 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0680940043366 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488805850809 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106735136816 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531996008845 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.55 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.