It is generally opined that all vehicles on roads must be replaced by electric vehicles owing to a huge consumption of conventional fuels. I strongly agree with the standpoint due to its overwhelmingly positive results related to global warming and its conservation for the future.
To begin with, it is inevitable that using electric traction, global warming can be curbed to a large extent. The petrol or diesel driven cars produce a huge amount of carbon content and emit many harmful gases. Therefore, the temperature levels are escalating and posing detrimental threats to the whole stratosphere. In addition, electric power driven locomotives do not contribute to the burgeoning pollution by not producing any flue gases. Hence, such alternatives are acting as a strong deterrent to decreasing quality of life perpetuated due to air pollution. Taking “Japan” as a telling example, the carbon emission was cut-down to almost 58% by just prohibiting old cars and subsidizing people to get them replaced with eco-friendly substitutes such as the solar power operated cars.
It is also irrefutable that the non-renewable energy sources can be preserved for future generations by adopting energy-efficient electric cars. Depleting natural resources is a thought-provoking issue, which can undoubtedly be curbed using modern electric traction systems. Electricity can be produced in hydro-electric power plants, using water as the only fuel without exploiting the environment and the same energy should be used by cars do not engender any environmental threat. Moreover, petrol and diesel’s stock can be maintained for futuristic usage. For instance, the consumption of diesel has seen a dramatic downfall with the emergence of electric vehicles in the last decade throughout the world.
In conclusion, to save conventional fuels and environment for the sake of humanity, the only possible and most efficacious solution is to get vehicles replaced by advanced electric vehicles.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58881578947 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31228766371 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595394736842 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5574964381 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.357142857 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230409522566 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671938678982 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610327887479 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122189565605 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375397040306 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.