Government should put tax on unhealthy food to promote better health Do you agree or disagree
In the contemporary era, culinary choices of people have been altered surreally because of which fast food has taken over the world. Most of these foods leave a grim effect on the physical condition of consumers. Because of this, I entirely agree with the idealogy of taxation of unhealthy food.
Firstly, one of the primary reasons why people are fascinated about this is its availability at a relatively lower price. So, people are hugely into it. So, imposing a tax would be a great idea to bring a hike in their prices. As the price increases, a lot of then would become hardly affordable thereby slashing down peoples interest in consuming them. Also, the manufacturing would also go down as taxes would increase their production cost.
Unhygienic nature has been the major factor contributing to the outbreak of hereditary epidemics. As an example, let us consider obesity which has been a major issue among all age groups. On this basis, it is obvious that this junk food culture must be brought to a halt. Imposing a tax not only protects the health of the public but can also be used to take up remedial measures to curb obesity. Thus diminishing the ghastly influences of unedible items out there.
In light of the fact that unhealthy eatables are proven to be devastating. Based on the above-stated reasons, I hereby conclude that tariffing fast food can be entirely appreciated and must be enforced as soon as possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 272, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'hardly' is usually put before the verb 'become'.
Suggestion: hardly become
...he price increases, a lot of then would become hardly affordable thereby slashing down people...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, really, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88163265306 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71062819401 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65306122449 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5148926627 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7333333333 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53333333333 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110451580157 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355704987259 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417769283616 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0657202972471 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346851719691 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.0946893788 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.