Governments prohibit the underage children for getting full-time jobs in certain countries. Is it good thing or bad thing?
Nowadays, using children’s power for full-time jobs is forbidden in some counties. In my opinion, it is positive development because the youth should go to school and have fulfilled childhood.
It is true that companies were using the youth as workforce throughout a history. It was not surprising that teenagers could work whole shift among adults on a factory. It may happened because families were huge and parents were not able to breed them on their own. Even today, some people may argue that the government should let children to get full-time work otherwise they could stuff to death. This is may be true for those countries where the most amount of population live below the poverty line.
However, there are some nations where child’s labor is violation of the law and children can get only part-time jobs if it will not interact with their schooling. From my perspective, it has several advantages because due to that, adults became more concern about upbringing and families became less in size. Along with it, the governments take responsibility to educate children and give them proper childhood. For instance, everyone in our country finished school because if a child did not went to school, his parents would be penalized or even deprived of parental rights.
In conclusion, prohibiting to underage children from getting full-time jobs in some countries seems as necessary measure and actually ensures the right of children for getting education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... whole shift among adults on a factory. It may happened because families were huge...
^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: less
...rn about upbringing and families became less in size. Along with it, the governments take re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 499, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'go', 'wend'
Suggestion: go; wend
...ished school because if a child did not went to school, his parents would be penaliz...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 239.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21338912134 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76656060851 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623430962343 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4998993557 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.833333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22993286346 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080150820903 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102583657175 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166990766192 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095775046535 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.