It is a commonly held belief that genetically-modified food plays a crucial role in the agricultural industry. Although there are a number of drawbacks in this trend, the benefits are by no means negligible.
On the plus side, the advantages accruing to farmers' income are manifold. To begin with, the most rational justification is that, genetic engineering makes crops more resistant to insects and diseases which leads to mass production and mass outputs. Growing genetic plants could increase the amount of harvest owing to characteristics of antipest. It also improves farmers' earnings which pose a positive effect on societies' economies. Genetically-engineered crops, furthermore, are larger and have a better texture with more nutrition values. A good illustration is the Taiwan genetically-modified rice with more vitamin B and the less risk of Diabetes diseases.
However, the downside cannot be ignored. The most axiomatic argument is that the manipulation of food changes its tastes. Take organic eggs and dairy products which are more hearty and delicious as an example. People's demand for these natural foods despite their high costs is more. Additionally, altering genes in some crops leads to serious unforeseen diseases such as allergies and cancer for people and dangerous repercussions for the environment. Take Some Brazilian genetically-changed nuts which cause severe allergies for people approximately over the last decade as an example. Authorities enacted legislation to stop producing these nuts as soon as possible. Not testing adequately for being safe food, they will be adversely affected and put people's health in jeopardy.
T sum up, producing genetically food could be both rewarding and problematic. Although they boost the amount of harvest which overshadows societies' economies and improve it, the people's health could be harmed.
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 88
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE BEST WAY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IS BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SPORTS FACILITIES OTHERS HOWEVER SAY THAT THIS WOULD HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THAT OTHER MEASURES ARE REQUIRED DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN 73
- the line graph below shows the consumption of four kinds of meat in a European Country from 1979 to 2004 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 89
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...societies economies and improve it, the peoples health could be harmed.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58450704225 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36201785462 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640845070423 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0676448481 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1111111111 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7777777778 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214479213884 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614008746984 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437498854623 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119432491338 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409995138725 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.