It is argued that the continuous growth of population around the world is creating feeding problems. GM foods seems a quick solution to this problem. In my point of view, I completely disagree with this statement, because it is known that this issue is related to economic and distribution problems
First of all, the volume of food production in the world is enough to feed the entire population. At present, aliments are produced on a big scale with modern technology, Countries like India and Argentina are large food productors; despite this, they have hunger problems in their populations. Thus, there is not a relation between a big population with feeding problems and a lack of food production.
Secondly, GM foods are not a real solution to this issue. The companies that produce this kind of modified aliments are in connection with the big food monopolies. For instance, in many countries, Monsanto has total control over grain production, like wheat and tomatoes. They have the management of the seed sales and they are promoting a campaign against small producers, who sell their lands to big productors. Accordingly, the big companies have utter control over the food production and they also regulate prices that directly affect many people, especially the poor in their access to ailments.
To conclude, GM food is not viable because they respond to economic interests and are responsible to arrange the economic value that impacts the food access to people. The problem is not the production volume to feed a growing population, is who is controlling this.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h the big food monopolies. For instance, in many countries, Monsanto has total co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for instance, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11969111969 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80229096147 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53667953668 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9138603505 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222499925736 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970572619412 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577330252962 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152422528974 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0466856770846 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.