Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this can not be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In these days, people often take a variety of veiwpoints when it comes to most daily life issue. To give illustration, there is no ample time for human to do positive effect in terms of saving the world from terrible environment for animal and plants, others hold the opinion that this is not the case. This essay offers some insights in favor of the latter outlook.

To coping with increaing people demand with controlling human activities across the world is unachievable, but the knowledge we possessed still can help people to set up some opportunities. First and foremost, it is better for people to use renewable resources, such as solar,wind ect. Not because those energy is clean also it can be benefit animals and species, that is as if the gift to theirs. Anothers significant argument is that people ought to concertrate on reduce and reuse things over recycling, waste minimirzaition is crucial for others. Last but not least, some special area are should kept for the plants and animal that can live longer without human effect signifcantly.

The human population has been increased more than ever before that people indeed need a wide range of space to do activities. One of the possibility is to explore the universe, and once human find the new land so people do not have to scarifice the animal on the earth that is a chance to take animal to another planet with us in the future so that people could gain a better life.

In conclusion, people have a variety methods to use positive effect the animal and plants in the world.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , wind
...o use renewable resources, such as solar,wind ect. Not because those energy is clean ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this energy' or 'those energies'?
Suggestion: this energy; those energies
...es, such as solar,wind ect. Not because those energy is clean also it can be benefit animals...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, so, still, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76951672862 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60085996836 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587360594796 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2167367651 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.636363636 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4545454545 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241114551438 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0849081740495 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495440832612 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13609547426 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454072995038 0.056905535591 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 50.2224549098 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.