International entertainers, including sports personalities, often get paid millions of dollars in one year. In your view with widespread poverty in the world, are these huge earnings justified?
The wheel of money seems to be spinning in a direction more favourable to entertainment artists, in many parts of the world, in recent times than ever before in the past. These minor proportions of the world-renowned performers are being flourished with wealth when the rest of the world struggles to resolve the issues of hunger and famine. This essay attempts to depict a justification for why these popular figures are being paid handsomely despite using these funds to alleviate the alarming poverty rise all over the world.
To begin with, it should be acknowledged that most of the working class people lead a stressful work routine these days and they consider the shows of these artists as their stress busters. Watching their favourite artists perform in live shows, especially, when known the fact they are internationally famous, would leave no room for many people to pay any price to be in the crowd of such shows. Also since the number of celebrities is limited and are welcomed throughout the globe for their supporters' interest, it is more often than not they ought to be paid highly for their performances. For instance, Beyoncé would not have organized worldwide performances had she not been drawn by both money and fan followers.
Yet another reason in support for these entertainers and their high pay scale is that in a way they bring profit and employment for associated businesses. More precisely, it could not be ignored that how the faces of these entertainers when appeared on advertisement campaigns boost product sales and thereby opening job vacancies because of the need to expand business with the increasing demand. Considering Lionel Messi featuring on Adidas commercial, not only it improved the sales by manifold but also resulted in the opening of more outlets with a demand for more employees.
Thus, with so much for the alleviation of stressful life of today along with the possibility of other revenue sources through celebrity endorsement campaigns, this category of people should be supported with higher incomes since this money could never be otherwise used for poverty eradication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17261904762 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81642614599 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604166666667 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.7613953938 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.0 106.682146367 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.5454545455 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114342719544 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481331415609 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0339854382984 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0767488285684 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034652346165 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.3 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.