It will be better to have wide use of driverless car for individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Some are of the opinion that widespread automated vehicles will be more convenient for a person and for the society as a whole. Personally. I disagree with this notion as the technology is new and far from perfection yet. That is why it can bring along serious consequences.
First, let us imagine that driverless cars are affordable and numerous citizens are driving them. Thus, from my perspective the number of car accidents will increase due to imperfection of the equipment. Someone might say that it is not a case because electronics will be sophisticated enough. However, we should not forget that driverless cars are not only about electronics, but also about navigation devices and maps in particular. To illustrate, as a professional cartographer I am sure that there are no perfect electronic maps as they become outdated very quickly.
Secondly, spreading automated cars may lead to cancellation of driving licenses and as a result the number of vehicles on the roads will rapidly increase. Consequently, not speaking about increased traffic jams, quantity of exhaust fumes will arise and atmosphere pollution as well. For example, during the first Covid-19 quarantine authorities of our city had forbidden for cars moving in from outside the city and local traffic was reduced as well. Thus, I could inhale fresh and crisp air and observe a surprisingly blue sky then.
In conclusion, I totally disagree that wide use of driverless cars is worthy as it will result in an increased number of emergency situations on the roads and rising environmental issues in cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 535, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d observe a surprisingly blue sky then. In conclusion, I totally disagree that w...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in particular, speaking about, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17054263566 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.005493438 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616279069767 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5479030351 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.615384615 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228175741186 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683568026353 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555363995474 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138526702086 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383524739051 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.