Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Your opinion- good or bad

In this day and age, small shops are giving up their own place to shopping centers. Although replacing small shops with malls regarded as thoroughly constructive and benefit for industries and consumers, there is an opposing viewpoint with this changing. For the purpose of this essay, I would discuss how far advantages of this replacing are.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support developing malls in every town and city. At first, although shopping centers can not to be placed in every district and close to your house but, this weakness has covered by cheaper products and diverse products very well. For example, I can buy all of my needs in the local shop center and I do not need to go anywhere for purchasing. In fact, it is saving time for me.
Secondly, by this changing producers and companies will try to save their own position and window in these malls. This can make a competitive advantage among different industries. Some small producers maybe do not able remain in this competition but products of better quality will be accessible. A recent scientific conducted with Tehran University researchers in 2016 shows promoting shopping centers caused by increasing quality of most yields.
In conclusion, the benefits of replacing large shopping malls with small shops are far outweighed of their drawbacks such as price reduction, saving time and creating the competitive advantage as well.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this day and age, small shops are giv...
^^^^
Line 1, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w far advantages of this replacing are. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng. In fact, it is saving time for me. Secondly, by this changing producers and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by increasing quality of most yields. In conclusion, the benefits of replacing...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 234.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08974358974 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70823197268 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606837606838 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7030018855 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198518715692 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706252800964 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734507963365 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139069605824 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812552686664 0.056905535591 143% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.