Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since the computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, due to advancement in technology and easy access to the resources such as laptop and computer, people prefer to read via web instead of going to the libraries. This trend has given rise to a question, whether public libraries are waste of money? I totally disagree with statement and believe that we need them even in the today’s world. In the following easy we would discuss the advantages and disadvantages they bring to us.
On one hand, libraries have numerous benefits. Firstly, internet and technological gadgets such as laptops and computers are not approachable for everyone. In India, for instance, many villages do not have such facilities, thereby, making libraries, only option to gather information. Secondly, some people find it difficult to read on these devices. For them reading on hard copies and books is much more comfortable. Lastly, libraries provide the calm and peaceful environment to concentrate which is generally not available at other places. Finally, extensive exposure of these tools namely computers, laptops etc, have adverse impact on the eyes of reader. Hence, it is apparent that libraries have many benefits those cannot be avoided.
On the other hand, there are few clear disadvantages of having libraries. To begin with, sometimes libraries are far from one’s house, thus, making it time consuming to reach there. In addition to that, when new books or articles are published, they are available on internet earlier than in the libraries. Moreover, government has to spend money to maintain them and to pay to its staff. However, these are few demerits of libraries, they are not convincing at all.
In conclusion, after looking at both sides, it is evident that libraries are a significant part of our life now and are not wastage of money. However, I would suggest that the government should computerize them, so that, people who do not have computers, leverage
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ople who do not have computers, leverage
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, lastly, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19871794872 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84008361685 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605769230769 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.826645954 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3684210526 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4210526316 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84210526316 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136547808525 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385554573703 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450832748141 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809701910801 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02368611722 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.