The concept of hefty remuneration is associated with few people in numerious nations. While some individuals consider this phenomenon to be lucrative for the country, others feel that restrictions on the amount of salaries ought to be imposed by the governments. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument and also provide the personal opinion in favour of the second viewpoint.
According to the proponents of the former outlook, people, irrespective of their number, earning high wages substantially contribute to the economy of a country. In other words, along with high salaries, there comes increased consumerism( increase in the purchasing power of the people). When people start buying more goods as compared to the past, the National income of the country will experience a considerable growth simultaneously. A recent survey conducted in India has revealed that 30% of the rich tend to purchase luxury cars and houses, directly boosting the economy by paying more taxes to the government.
On the other hand, the opponents of this opinion claim that the amount of remuneration should not exceed a certain rate. The underyling reason for such people to think this way is the spread of the notion of discrimination among the public. That is to say, a small number of high-salary earners may treat the rest of the population with disrespect, whereby counsequently breeding the sense of insecurity in low-earners. For example, it is psychologically proven that the feelings of dissillusionment and despair are more likely to arise in people who earn relatively less money than some of their colleagues.
In conclusion, it is true that, in many parts of the world, there is a small quantity of people who recieve high wages. Although it is beneficial for countries' economic
development, I do believe that this is the clear representation of inequality among the citizens. Therefore, it is best for every government to adopt the policy ensuring the equal distribution of salaries for every employee.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...es of the argument and also provide the personal opinion in favour of the second viewpoint. A...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 258, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...ation among the public. That is to say, a small number of high-salary earners may treat the rest ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Development
...is beneficial for countries economic development, I do believe that this is the clear re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24074074074 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08527756643 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.473353583 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.285714286 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.333491548643 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090395413811 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362174399811 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159280447262 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436807384723 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.