It is true that, in this contemporary era, working hard is being done by only few people and they are getting high salaries from big companies. So it is best for our country, whereas other introspect that government must set limit or control the remuneration level at a specific level. In addition, I am totally agree with this statement.
To start with, firstly, these days all people are doing hard work for getting good income whether they are small workers or any professional. Secondly, if only few people would earn more money so it would create bad feelings like inequality, jealousy and hatred among people who are earning less money. Thirdly, government should take care of all youngsters and elder that they are able to complete their basic needs or not beacuse when they would able so after that definately, they would give their best or full focus to enhancing the profit of companies and then it would also amendment our economy.
Looking at the other view, high incomes distribution within few people it may be good. Firstly, they have their good degrees and they are able to do work for more than their capabilities and able to enhance the profit of companies. For instance, sundar Pichai CEO of Google he is indian. He has good skills and degrees that is why Google is giving to him high package. There are lots of example of bollywood, Hollywood stars, cricketers and so on.
On a concluding note, undoubtedly high salaries for those people who have good skills as well as knowledge it is good yet, we must understand that it may put pressure on some small people for taking some heinous steps like kidnapping, robbery etc. Government should take care of all the people and if people would do great work with full of dedication after that companies would pay high incomes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 313, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...ecific level. In addition, I am totally agree with this statement. To start with, ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey would able so after that definately, they would give their best or full focus...
^^
Line 5, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'incomes'' or 'income's'?
Suggestion: incomes'; income's
...omy. Looking at the other view, high incomes distribution within few people it may b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, as well as, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7845659164 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46710348403 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559485530547 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.4557029664 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.461538462 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6923076923 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251619547098 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898963783931 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598343723136 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163935358121 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496135827666 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.