Nowadays modern technology has made it possible to work comfortably from anywhere. As a result, it has become increasingly common for employees to opt for work from home. However, some are of a school of thought that this approach is only beneficial to the worker and not the employers. In my opinion, I completely disagree and believe that work from home should be encouraged as it minimizes cost of overheads and enables people to work across different time zones.
To begin with, workers who work at home are provided with the necessary devices and access. They are given the flexibility to work at their convenience as long as the outcome is error free. Furthermore, working remotely helps the worker to save time on travel and can invest more time at work. According to a survey conducted by Google, those working from home were more efficient than those at work. Therefore, using modern technology to facilitate productivity is vital for both the employer and employee.
In addition, the company saves tremendously on overhead costs such as office expenses, canteen facilities, travel allowance, etc. Consequently, the money saved can be invested in training and development of the staff or given as bonus to encourage better performance. Moreover, if people are working in different time zones the company can provide 24 hours coverage. Many IT companies adopt this method to provide continuous support to their clients and customers. Hence, by curbing unnecessary expenditures employers can thereby increasing their profits.
To recapitulate, technological development has made life easy for everyone. It is a win-win situation as the pros of working from home outweigh the cons. In conclusion, I believe, if the well-being of the employee is given priority, it reflects on the culture of the company and in turn makes both prosperous.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21812080537 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94899244852 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3619845898 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.4705882353 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.17647058824 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281366667059 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843480935928 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529112369133 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163474617648 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920136219756 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.