These days, a large number of stores in high street have run out of business. There are various reasons why this phenomenon has happened; and, I have a thought that it brings advantages more than disadvantages for the development.
This phenomenon has happened because of some reason. Firstly, although people must buy some essential things, they do not tend to go out for them. Due to the convenience of online shopping, customers choose a range of products on the Internet only by one-click-mouse. Moreover, the items are usually cheaper than those in high street shops because of the lack of rental payment and direct customer care services; thus, the clients have bargain sales. Secondly, the local high street shop could be disappeared by multinational businesses. For instance, extensive marketing and advertising by big companies is a threat to the very existence of small businesses. Having the availability of excess money, big companies can buy several local stores and monopolize the products.
While I accept that this phenomenon can sometimes have disadvantages, I consider that they are more likely to have advantages for both economic and social progression. On the one hand, it makes the proportion of underprivileged rise fastly. To illustrate, if many shops face closing, the reduction of employment opportunity will increase; consequently, the unemployment rate increase as well. However, this phenomenon provides better service and diverse options for customers. In other words, it could lead to the development of other sectors such as delivery service companies; and, customers could have door-to-door service. Therefore, modern people do things through smartphones and computer online shopping for goods or food.
In conclusion, there are a plethora of reasons why various high street stores have put out of business nowadays. Also, it brings some things which are good or bad for the development; but, the positive effects outweigh their drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
These days, a large number of stores in high street have run out of b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42207792208 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02783371871 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61038961039 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.081220639 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2352941176 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1176470588 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88235294118 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257569764508 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747077992406 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607738711543 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159728136125 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219565662165 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.