News stories on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures. Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words. What is your opinion about this?
Researchers around the world are bringing modern, and a varied array of marketing strategies to cast the latest series, news or information. These perplexed thoughts are what we are going to discuss.
People are dubious, whether to be more descriptive, or to be more precise. While a written data may be specific, a pictorial image might create a better place in the mind of an individual. In this era of digitalization and globalisation, it becomes vital for any conglomerate to focus on each mode of advertisement. In the need of the hour, where radios, flex boards and newspapers are being replaced with TV’s, digital signage board and digital/social news respectively, picturisation helps a person comprehend better. To exemplify, Dominos, initiated the process of sharing their pamphlets in the newspaper with images of pizza, depicting the original. this idea was so successful that most of the competitors are still following the trend. I would agree to the fact that pictures are not only a source of sharing data, but also plays an important role in content writing.
A synopsis, has revealed, that philanthropists are avid readers, and often spend majority of the life reading and learning. these users are generally not looking for an image or a picture. For illustration, Economic Times is a newspaper that it published worldwide, read by leaders and enthusiasts, and this, not to mention has no images or colour schemes.
To conclude, and comprehending that the world is growing at an incomparable pace, it would not be a surprise, if we start getting digitalised newspapers shown in fiction movies like Harry Potter. To my opine, I would suggest having a world-class marketing and designing team, to do a thorough research, and add informative or correlated pictures wherever necessary or possible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 661, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...mages of pizza, depicting the original. this idea was so successful that most of the...
^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...ority of the life reading and learning. these users are generally not looking for an ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, still, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24489795918 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16773329399 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639455782313 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7080910981 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.142857143 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137027775527 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0422553095373 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264291769381 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0711786670262 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251487672712 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.