Nowadays children's writing and mathematical abilities are affected by computers and calculators. Some people argue that we should limit the usage of these tools in schools. Do you agree or disagree?
This truth is universally acknowledged fact that there is a drastic change in each and every field just due to the rapid advancement in technology. It is believed that computers play positive role for writing as well as mathematical calculators while others refute this thought. These Points of view will be discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, nowadays computer becomes mandatory subject for education throughout the world. Learners can solve complex calculation within slump time by using contemporary gadgets. For instances, In Japan, the students can use calculator during examination in colleges and Universities. So, if the calculator are used by students since from lower classes then it would be beneficial in further education. Inclusively, with the help of computer, we can improve writing skill without go to educational institution. One can use numerous software such as, Microsoft Office and so on. We can do editing and navigating which plays precursor role to enhance the quality of work. Therefore, it is a big reason that many thinkers gravitate towards this phenomenon.
On the flip side, some people argue that it has adversely affects on pupils. Students are addicted to use calculator even for small calculations in various nations. To paraphrase, In Australia, according to the recent surveys of The Times of India, children cannot solve some convenient problems like 12*2 and 14+15. What is more, they usually face problems in real examination which may lead to failure in some subjects.
After analyzing the aforesaid points, it has been proven that it has been proven that it has benefits and drawbacks indeed. However, we have not to use such gadgets in all circumstances so that upcoming generation would become more intelligent, independent and confident.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...education throughout the world. Learners can solve complex calculation within slu...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elligent, independent and confident.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38245614035 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96407960902 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670175438596 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3617369775 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.2352941176 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7647058824 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118176434218 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0360374248916 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466128067967 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0638840480476 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318330065732 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.