Nowadays food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people live?
Most of the food items that were hard to prepare and restricted to experienced chefs are now easily available off the shelf or are made easy to prepare with modern recipes. But like any other thing, this also has its advantages and disadvantages.
Firstly, most of these foods are high in saturated fats and eventually leads to obesity. They cannot become substitutes for our staple diet that is still not so easy to prepare due to nature of its cooking methods. For example, for most of the Indians, the staple diet includes a combination of Indian bread, pulses and curries. It is not possible to make it much easier even using modern equipment or methods. Secondly, most of the easy to prepare food items either have a very little shelf life or they need to be kept frozen (or both). Thus they cannot match the nutrition of freshly prepared traditional home food.
Having said that, these easy to prepare food items are a boon to students or other people, who stay away from home. They are definitely better than eating in restaurants or street food. Although not as good as home food, they definitely purpose the purpose to get “home-like” food. Also, most of these food items come with handy instructions and pre-mixed ingredients. With simple instructions, anybody can cook most of the recipes now. This has life easier for many across the globe.
With the advent of easy availability of raw ingredients, it has not become much easier to cook recipes at home that was previously possible to cherish only in high-end restaurants. For instance, the Italian pasta, which requires many types of sauces, is now easy to prepare at home and all these sauces are now just a call away from a local grocery shop.
In conclusion, this is a much welcomed and positive change and it has definitely improved our lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...or they need to be kept frozen or both. Thus they cannot match the nutrition of fres...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83757961783 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68152298893 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541401273885 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1537592193 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3529411765 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23529411765 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146115699588 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531534726738 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417935021794 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937300310245 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045356865236 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.