Mobile phones are considerd as the invention of the century. Nowadays everyone's life is totally depend's up on this small gadget. People do almost everything with this device and its possibilities increasing day by day. As a result of this huge popularity and convenience even children are using this device widely. Many say it is good. Some say its is bad. I would like to take nuetral stand on this.
Mobile phones are very helpful to the children in many ways. Firstly, it can be great addition to their studies. For instance, if a child wants to know more about second world war and it's consequences, he will get the information by simply searching on the web using their gadget. Secondly, a child can use this equipment as safety device. For example, if they ran in to any troubles like accidents or something, they can immediately inform this to their parents or responsible persons. Last but not the least, children can also use cellphones for improving their intelligence and thinking by playing games like 'sudoku'.
On the contrary, there is also a greater chance that children may misuse this device. They some times use their device to collect or download totally unwanted or inappropriate items. Moreover, according to the recent study revealed that children are getting addicted to this gadget, they are spending most of their free time on this without doing any physical activity. Furthermore, like every technological inventions it also has some harmful effects. Mobile phones are emitting radiation content at small percentage but if someone uses this device for long hours it will become very harmful to their health because of the continues exposure to the radiation content.
In conclusion, we can say that like every technological device, it has both advantages and disadvantages. There is nothing wrong in children using mobile phones but their use should be properly monitored since children are very vulnerable to its negative effects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10559006211 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73719315726 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562111801242 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.1602294954 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202162544911 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872163881435 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124705213799 0.0667982634062 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135780680495 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462072463904 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.