Nowadays, many natural places are damaged by people who keep throwing their garbage. What are the causes? How can this be solved?
In the present era, individuals have harmed several natural places because of their irresponsible act of throwing garbage, which has deleterious effects at such places. This essay shall delineate fundamental causes of such behaviours and plausible solutions to save imperative areas of the world.
The absence of exposure to a clean environment and proper maintenance by governments is an intrinsic reason of such a severe consequence. Equipping indispensable knowledge of keeping nature safe and clean to the public has been often ignored by administrations, which inflicts carelessness in people while they explore the beauty of natural places. Moreover, authorities have not taken any initiative to provide frequent cleaning to such places and no dustbins have been set-up to avoid dirty atmosphere. For instance, people throw plastics wrappers and bottles because of no inspection or warning to tourists, which hinders the greenery because plastics hampers the growth of plants.
Countries and mankind should take the crucial responsibility to take care of their surroundings and keep them tidy. Children and juveniles should be taught about cleanliness and rendered cautious of throwing anything. Furthermore, nations should implement a strict inspection of an explorer’s movement and a severe penalty in case of any prohibition. Besides, governments should place dustbins at various places to make it convenient for tourists to throw used or unnecessary goods. To illustrate, infants and students must be educated about good the essence of clean environment to make them oblivion of their moral duties.
In conclusion, natural places are distinctive geographical zones which play significant role in the development of the planet. Therefore, one should be conscious of its doing and strive to make such areas clean to avoid repercussions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-11 | Chirag Bhardwaj | 78 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century and the protection is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading To what extent do you agree Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 84
- Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences Others however believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that the best way to get the news is through newspapers while others think it is through online media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Nowadays it is possible to move ocean creatures from their natural habitat at sea and have them relocated in amusement parks for the purpose of people s recreation Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'has' and 'been'.
Suggestion: has often been
...ing nature safe and clean to the public has been often ignored by administrations, which infli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6523297491 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11339790095 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2833535118 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.307692308 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182174342055 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598391385434 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358877502637 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106539046484 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237533150389 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.