In recent years, branding plays an important role to create decisions among people to buy new kinds of stuff with branded logos such as fashion and technology. It could affect positive and negative values depending on the situation and condition of the buyers. This essay will explain both sides and give examples.
It is true that spending more money on branded products without good budget management means a bad habit. It could be worst if people just buy famous and branded products to increase their social ladder economy. For instance, middle-class income people encourage themselves to have luxurious stuff just to follow trends in their community.
On the other hand, there are various reasons for people to buy branded products. Firstly, people realize that buying branded products determines a lot of benefits for the originality, quality, and trustworthiness of the products. Instead of using products with short time use, people think it would be cheaper if they afford expensive products for long-term use with the same function. For instance, people prefer to buy products from America compared to China because this buyer is aware of the quality. This is why the buyers want to pay more for it. Secondly, in the social-economic standard, people will have confidence if they use the best quality products. Then, people will look like Self-esteem plays an important role.
In conclusion, although buying fashioned products leads to negative impacts if people do not aware of their budget, the main purpose for buying fashioned products is quality and prestige as long as these people stay on their budget. Therefore, it leads to more positive development than drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'be the worst'.
Suggestion: be the worst
... management means a bad habit. It could be worst if people just buy famous and branded p...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25461254613 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65885531399 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579335793358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.322252224 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9333333333 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284157452381 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998002931977 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065034429688 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162404865831 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384276124536 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.