Today, technology has created a new way for people in communicating with each other. In my opinion, this has become negative development because the drawback of the situation exceed its benefit.
On the one hand, technology has helped people in distance to communicate easily. If previously people in distance could only communicate through letters, which arrived in a long time, today people can interact through social media applications. As a result, feeling such as homesickness and lonesome can be treated by the existence of technology inventions. For example, Rob goes to a college which is located far away from his hometown. Because currently there are a lot of social media applications, Rob can still communicate with their parents who live in his hometown.
On the other hand, the existence of technology has made relationship to be cold and not genuine. The new technology inventions such as social media application has made people to connect and befriend easily with their own social media profiles. Sadly, this does not reflect the real relationship of someone with other people. Even though their social media profiles are linked each other, but they are often actually distant in real life. For example, the number of friends in the social media applications do not reflect the real friends that someone has. As a result, so many people feel lonely and depressed in this modern era, even though they have so many friends in social media applications.
In conclusion, the way technology changed people's way in communicating with each other has led into negative development because even though it helped people in distance to communicate easily, but it has made relationship to be cold and not genuine, which affect the mental health of many people today.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, so, still, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17993079585 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80848662651 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487889273356 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3801334747 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368486809931 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131933897863 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119521938401 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.282144082174 0.151304729494 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133837538426 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.