Today, every country around the world is facing a common problem of increased amount of garbage. Although with the modernization, industries in various sectors have grown but at the same time this industrial development has increased waste production in the environment. There is no doubt both people and government must take actions to reduce the production of rubbish.
Various reasons are there for increase in rubbish. To begin with, most of the waste comes from packaging from the things we buy. Nowadays, since trend is going todards having nuclear families where every family member is in a job and have no time to cook traditional food. So, people in order to save time, t adapt the habits of buying readymade eatable items which are ofcourse fast to cook and eat. Although, food is tasty, but it is generating tremendous amount of garbage which is definetly worsening our environment. Secondly, however, the amount of waste produce is also result of our tendency to use something once and throw it away. We forget that even the cheapest plastic has used up valuable resources and energy to produce. We also forget it is a source of pollution and difficult to dispose of.
I do believe that government needs to take stern actions to save environment from such wastes. Moreover, they should raise this awareness in public. By promoting the use of reusable bags when shopping, the amount of plastic bags can be greatly reduced. Also, children can be educated about environmental issues at school, but adult needs to take action. Another important step government must take through sound cycling. It must invest in a technology that can be managed at municipal level. To encourage its citizens to adhere to this program, collection areas for recycling should be accessible.
In conclusion, with the political will, such measures could really reduce the amount of rubbish we produce. Certainly nobody wants to see our resources used up and planet poisoned by waste.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 808, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pollution and difficult to dispose of. I do believe that government needs to ta...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, as for, in conclusion, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05828220859 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67149738254 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598159509202 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.290399451 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.45 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164195136178 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461475217193 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412121586729 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09601867602 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131015926099 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.