All living organisms produce waste, also, human is one of those organism that produce a large amount of waste. The waste needs to be managed by burning or burying which both solutions also produce other pollution problems. This essay will discuss the cause and solution to this problem.
There are mainly two reasons that caused the increase in rubbish. Firstly, the number of world population has increased exponentially in the past decades. More people in the world surely increase the amount of waste because of their daily consumption. Secondly, materialism also plays a very important role in this problem. Many people buy a new phone because it is more beautiful or slightly better and their old phones are sold into the second hand market, this loop rolls until the final buyers buy a second hand phone and throw away their old phones because they have no value to be sold in the market.
One way to solve the problem is to impose tax on non-recyclable products or parts to encourage both buyers and sellers to refrain from producing waste that is hard to manage. A fair amount of recycle deposit should also be added to recyclable product to make sure that they are going to be returned for recycling instead of being thrown away. Another solution is to raise awareness about environmental impact to all generations, in particular, children. They should be responsible on the garbage they produce by making sure that the garbage will be handled correctly.
In summary, rubbish is an important threat of the environment. In particular, the increase in rubbish is caused by the increase in population and materialism. The government should fight against this problem in both education and tax penalty to make sure that the problem can be solved fast and sustained.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this organism' or 'those organisms'?
Suggestion: this organism; those organisms
...ms produce waste, also, human is one of those organism that produce a large amount of waste. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, in particular, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97315436242 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63090672488 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543624161074 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6726942844 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127805830215 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0472252036876 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315229626901 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0829995856861 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352680674681 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.