In the modern world, humans' overreliance on private vehicles is arguably the main cause of traffic congestion and the degradation of air quality. However, it is argued that to reverse the situation, each family should only own one private vehicle. I agree with this opinion in some circumstances. The following paragraphs will discuss the opinion and my perception.
It is reasonable to believe that the restriction on the number of cars owned by each family plays a significant role in mitigating the problems of air pollution and traffic jam. First of all, it contributes to encouraging a growing number of citizens to take public transports to the destination, thereby bringing about a slump in the number of cars on the road as well as the total amount of car exhaust. Moreover, this restriction could also increase the popularity of active travel, including cycling and walking, which allows commuters to exercise regularly and maintain their health. Besides, it is also consistent with the universal principles of promoting environmental-friendly transport modes.
On the other hand, it is also believed that the limitation will also result in a series of issues. In the first place, it posts various inconveniences on most residents. For instance, many people who live in rural area or countryside will find it difficult to travel to work without their cars, as the public transport system in many cities is inadequate and consequently incapable of meeting the needs of numerous citizens. As a result, those people will spend an excessive amount of time merely on commuting. Additionally, there are large numbers of families each of which includes over four members, so it is also impossible to utilize only one car to carry all members at one time.
In my opinion, it is worth mentioning that the strict control about the ownership of the number of private vehicles per each family could minimize people's reliance on cars, thereby enhancing traffic and easing the problem of pollution. Overall, I believe that it is an appropriate approach. However, we should also concern about the inconveniences caused by this control.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 346 350
No. of Characters: 1746 1500
No. of Different Words: 190 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.313 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.046 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.947 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 136 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 103 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.625 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.357 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.505 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.058 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 711, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...environmental-friendly transport modes. On the other hand, it is also believed t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as, first of all, in my opinion, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22222222222 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06019541951 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.1838496566 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.058823529 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.58823529412 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147609088648 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04019891298 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447222199543 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920723487465 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0428158952294 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.