In the past, lectures were used as a way of teaching large numbers of students, but now with the development of technology for education, many people think there is no justification for attending lectures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
online solutions are extremely accepted among learners since they are more accessible and more efficient. Advancement in technology and the introduction of high-speed internet to homes lead to online learning platforms. These platforms are more accessible to people unlike traditional learning which required to be present in a physical place. People now can go online and by pressing a few numbers of buttons on the web start learning. Ease of concentration on the lecture is another point that makes them more interesting for learners. In contrast to large classes with a great number of students in them and distributing noises, online classes provide a silent and pleasant atmosphere where increased the concentration and stimulate the learning.
In addition, online learning offers people to learn whenever they like. People are different. Some are more efficient in the morning and some in the afternoon. Being able to choose when you want to learn is a big plus for the online learning platforms since people can arrange their learning time themselves based on their needs. This is in contradiction with the old method that you have to be present in a predetermined time which may not be matching with your personality. For example, you had to attend a class in the morning while you are more efficient in the evenings.
In summary, the learning era with large and crowded classes has been passed and online solutions as a result of technology advancement and introduction of online learning platforms are the compelling replacement to the attending to the lectures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Online
online solutions are extremely accepted among ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
... plus for the online learning platforms since people can arrange their learning time ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, while, for example, in addition, in contrast, in summary, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21176470588 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93797472789 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 176.041082164 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513725490196 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2216739162 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.230769231 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6153846154 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149378587398 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579363294618 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392813404757 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107100864074 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122256189264 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.