Even though the levels of congestion and air pollutants shooting up in the majority of world cities, the use of personal vehicles such as cars has been soaring. The quality of life is continuously taking a nose dive in metropolitan and cosmopolitan areas. As a counter-action people must be stimulated to reduce the use of cars and opt for public transportation. In this essay, I will throw light on practicable techniques such as cost-effectiveness, cleanliness and introduction of government operated vehicle pooling services, which to enable people utilize public transports.
To begin with, governments should strive towards making public transit cost-effective. The prices needs to be revised and reduced on a seasonal basis. Secondly, during festive seasons various promotions, discounts and offers catch the interest of people. Finally, charges must be reduced on seasonal passes and as a consequence more number of students and senior citizens choose public transportation.
Furthermore, cleanliness and government operated vehicle pooling projects can attribute towards invigorating the use of public transport system. First and foremost, government has to be determined to preserve and promote neatness in trains and buses. For example, in countries like Japan and USA, there are strict rules and regulations and heavy fines would be imposed if people resort to uncleanly activities outside. In addition, government assisted vehicle pooling schemes should be introduced. There are people who compel on commuting by cars. To facilitate the requirements of such persons, memberships to register under state-supervised car sharing plans can be introduced under monthly, half-yearly and yearly subscriptions. This serves as a safe and secure commute system. Hence, cleanliness and government supported car pool projects push people to use public transit.
In conclusion, the quality of life which is deteriorating due to rocketing levels of congestion and pollutants in air resulting from the multiplying use of cars, can be back-pedaled by promoting public transport usage. The feasible approaches for this are cost-efficiency, sanitation and government-undertaken car sharing programs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'need'.
Suggestion: need
...blic transit cost-effective. The prices needs to be revised and reduced on a seasonal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.79938271605 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43848077693 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 579.6 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5907386733 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.388888889 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243939560815 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717605570445 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612518211354 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157513842069 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575136106145 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.