scientist predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in future
do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Earlier global and local were two ends of a dichotomous spectrum, but now due to technological advancements this bridge has dissolved. It is predicted that soon all inhabitants of this globe will speak one universal language, I believe that it’s a negative development. This trend will result in large cultural loss and will have a negative impact on psychological development of human brain. This essay shall discuss prospectus of universe adopting single language on cultures as on individuals.
Language of a culture carries history of its tradition along with it. Due to development of one global language will result in loss of several local languages hence ultimately result in disappearance of respective culture and its tradition. This can be explained by concrete example of era of British Colonization, during colonization of several African tribal areas by Britishers, they implementation English as official language during that era, had resulted in loss of local languages and hence resulting in extinction of tradition and culture which ultimately resulted in extinction of those tribes.
Furthermore, there has been a very compelling evidence that multilinguals are more intellectual than others. It has been proven by study done by Harvard university in 2009 that individuals speaking many languages has more cognitive development of brain as compared to others who spoke one or two languages. Hence due to development of one global language is going to produce a breed of psychologically weak individuals.
Although adoption of one universally spoken language has its benefit such as more exchange of knowledge and ideas and certainly more social interaction, but its cons outweigh the pros.
To sum up due to technological advancements we are now living in a village called “GLOCAL”and its assumed that soon there will a single universally spoken language. Adopting one global language will result in major cultural loss and would have negative impact on development of intellect in human brain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Earlier global and local were two ends o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uage on cultures as on individuals. Language of a culture carries history of...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 308, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... others who spoke one or two languages. Hence due to development of one global langua...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lopment of intellect in human brain.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, so, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51910828025 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28075099827 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531847133758 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.2111083194 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.307692308 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1538461538 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61538461538 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207298129829 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885579640809 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062414576664 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119726471648 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0722345315875 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.