Scientists predict that all people will choose to talk the same global language in the future.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Due to globalization, scientists have predicted that people will be speaking one common language in the near future. I believe that this phenomenon will have a negative impact on the culture and employment ratio of a country.
Undoubtedly, everyone speaking in a single language has its own benefits. Most important advantage will be easy communication between people. Relations between nations will improve which will result in economic growth. For instance, tourists can travel anywhere without the fear of having a language barrier. Right now, I cannot even imagine traveling to Japan without the help of an interpreter because the signboards are in their native language which is a puzzle to tourists like me.
Nevertheless, the negative effects far outweigh the positive development. The most important negative effect will be damage to the culture of a country. Language represents the identity and culture of the people. Slowly and steadily, the local languages will perish and the history and culture will be lost with it. For instance, recent research suggests that Africa has lost 80% of its indigenous languages and precious artifacts and manuscripts with historical languages are left without any translations. With the lost languages, the entire world has lost culture and history which would have been beneficial in one way or another.
Furthermore, the employment of a large section of society will be lost. The local guides and language interpreters of any country contribute a lot to the local economy. With globalization, travel has become much easier and people travel to different places nearly every time of the year. If everyone would speak the same language, no one would require guides and interpreters and it will result in the unemployment of a huge number of people.
To conclude, having a single language has its own benefits but it will create unemployment and risk the culture and history of a country. Hence, I strongly believe that it will have a negative effect on society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25077399381 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87614266141 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498452012384 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3057294731 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2631578947 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 7.06120827912 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20041174523 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690933348588 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493666811609 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128520802078 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0622109074168 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.