In some countries, employees are generally given two weeks of paid vacation time each year. In other countries, employees are given four or six weeks of paid vacation time.
Considering the needs of both employee and employer, what do you think is a reasonable amount of paid vacation time for employees to have?
Some people argue that paid leaves should be given to the employees annually for four-six weeks, while others argue that it should be for two weeks. This essay argues that a long duration of off-time would cost the employer, while in my opine, two weeks off time is adequate to energize.
On the one hand, paid leaves are an expense to the company because the salary paid for no service provided. Therefore company costs increase with every non-working days. Moreover, the employer has to ensure for short term replacement from the existing workforce and also have to provide him training and additional allowances for added responsibilities which further adds to the cost. For example, Malaysia has the highest number of holidays apart from the annual leaves, so thereby giving more than two weeks of leave become impractical and infeasible for company.
On the other hand, short breaks are quite essential as it helps to revitalize. In other words, breaks help the staff to have a clearer mind to start fresh with a greater concentration that improves their performances. For instance, I have always opted for a few days off before taking up the next bucket of work. I believe, off days are directly proportional to efficiency, so thereby having a proper balance of work and holidays reduce the stress.
In conclusion, although six-weeks leave is an employee dream, but would cost company fortunes have a detrimental effect on their business. Consequently, two-weeks paid off is more viable as it improves their productivity at work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...he salary paid for no service provided. Therefore company costs increase with every non-w...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, moreover, so, therefore, while, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09842519685 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7326266548 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622047244094 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6935746449 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.916666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5833333333 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169795774985 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596245728627 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05860659071 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11472917514 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796961780095 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.