There is no doubt of saying that generating more money with the resources of nation is always considered as fruitful. Similarly, earning high salaries bring number of horizons for development within the country. On the contrary, there are some who believe that putting limit on the income of the people would be a good decision for government. I would explicate both the views in the upcoming texts.
To begin with, there are number of reasons why earning hard income by some wealthy benefit to country. First and foremost, more earning always brings more profit for the country development as maximum amount of tax collection is done from some affluent people. Additionally, more tax collection becomes the cause of nation being developed in terms of infrastructure, transportation and other services. Fixing stability in the country’s economy is very important, which is merely possible by the contribution of wealthy class which later becomes the cause of fulfilling the income level gap in the population. As a result, earning hard income by some makes the country more broaden and expand.
On the other hand, the people who have assertion that putting the limit on the people’s income level is a good way in order to make the balance among people. Generally, as people are getting more rich by their income level, whereas the poor class are being more poorer in some developing countries. Having said that, many countries avoid to make control on their income level. To bring the nation in the stream line, making the balance in the income level may be productive.
In conclusion, although deciding to make limit on the income level probably makes the country equivalent, but generation of more income by wealthy class always bring prosperity, peace and development for the country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'poorer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: poorer
...level, whereas the poor class are being more poorer in some developing countries. Having sa...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, may, similarly, so, whereas, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15986394558 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73409518948 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496598639456 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1800491422 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211584411569 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860115566029 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720113151832 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139669423955 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723376891524 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.