In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decided to do this.
Taking a break from studies after higher secondary is quite popular in some nations. The culture over there generates enthusiasm in them for using this time either to gain some work experience or to visit different countries. There is no doubt that this practice is certainly advantageous as it helps in learning about new culture and having an extra income. However, it may also have adverse effects on students which may cut-off them entirely from getting enrolled for future studies.
Visiting different places makes people learn about different cultures which help them in enhancing their knowledge. This in turn, makes them wiser and enables them to make better decisions for their future prospects. For instance, many of them may pursue career in wildlife photography or some of them may want to work for tourism companies, which may not have been possible if they did not had that kind of experience. To exemplify, Nas Daily, a popular social media star gave up his seat at MIT USA after taking a year off to visit entire world. He ultimately landed up a better job at Thomas cook with higher pay scale. To add on, teenagers also get a source of income. This job helps them to earn extra money which they may use to pay their fees in future. Furthermore, it also provides them with a firsthand work experience about the real life market scenarios which makes them more focused for their future goals.
Having said that, being away from education for an entire year has its own repercussions. It somehow disconnects students from upcoming studies as they spent a good part of their time on work and travel. In other words, they get accustomed to travel and have a quality time instead of getting bored in college sessions. For example, Niti Chandra, a famous blogger from India, dropped her plans for college after visiting Himalayas region. She decided to settle over there and open a cafe instead of continuing her studies and get more successful. Moreover, the income they have while working makes them crave more for it as it helped them to maintain their social status. This eventually hampers their mindset and they shift towards working rather than getting a degree. To illustrate, according to a recent survey conducted by Oxford Business School, people who work before getting enrolled for graduation are more prone to drop this idea and rather work, because of which, a handsome number of seats remain emptied for 2018-19 session.
To conclude, it is a welcome step to either have some travel experience or get a job prior to continue further university studies as it helps monetarily and provides a good knowledge of different ethnicities and their culture around the world. But the negative impact ought to be looked after which may prove to be detrimental and deteriorate the interest of students in future studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 392, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
... not have been possible if they did not had that kind of experience. To exemplify, ...
^^^
Line 5, column 751, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ey which they may use to pay their fees in future. Furthermore, it also provides them wit...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 230, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[4]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'accustomed to traveling', 'accustomed to travelling'.
Suggestion: accustomed to traveling; accustomed to travelling
...rk and travel. In other words, they get accustomed to travel and have a quality time instead of gett...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, second, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, kind of, no doubt, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 41.998997996 164% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2374.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 479.0 315.596192385 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95615866388 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49187293956 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530271398747 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 741.6 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4976883523 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.909090909 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7727272727 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184249452319 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557541478996 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423117714361 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115990054497 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461126066873 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.