Some people prefer to provide help and support directly to those in need. Others however prefer to give money to national and international charitable organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While some people would rather not assist the less fortunate through a third party individual or organisation, others would, preferably, grant financial supports to the poor through voluntary organisations. This essay will discuss both viewpoints. This essay agrees that providing assistance to the less privileged without involving anyone will prevent using the resources provided for their personal gain.
First and foremost, rendering one-on-one assistance would reduce embezzlement. This way, the donations, which could be in form of money or goods, will get into the hands of the needy and would not be diverted into family members of the third-party. A recent investigation carried out shows that the 50% of the money giving to the Garrett Home for the poor was found in the founders personal account. For this reason, this essay agrees that direct help should be rendered to people who want it.
One the other hand, anonymous givers would choose to give through charities. This is because they do not like to known in the society and so that they would not be persuaded to give by friends and close acquaintances. Sometimes, they go to far countries just to prevent close families from seeking for their help. This signifies that giving money through charities is has its drawback.
To conclude, even though some people choose to be in face-to-face contact with those they are helping to stop diversion of funds, other would rather give these funds to non-governmental organisations. However, assisting the less privilege directly will ensure they are adequately provided for.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d, anonymous givers would choose to give through charities. This is because they ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30434782609 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79844130314 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600790513834 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7533774782 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.230769231 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4615384615 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 7.06120827912 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187119934068 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0700540356213 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463972485527 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12400918411 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417191523705 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.