Some people say that parents should encourage their children to take part in organized group activities in their free time. Others say that it is important for children to learn how to occupy themselves on their own.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Some parents motivate their children to participate in arranged group activities while others find it essential to engage themselves solely with their projects. The benefits of kids' involvement with other people are undeniably overweighing their works on an individual basis.
Engagement with group activities might increase the child's ability to socialize and could boost his/her cooperation. It would not only result in fruitful interactions and peering with other minds but also trigger more self-confidence and emotional well-being. We can expect healthy competitiveness between the same age class members whenever tasks are assigned as well as the exchange of knowledge.
Various group works might include talents-enhancing activities. For instance, kids can improve their music or art capabilities when they take part in such meetings. Similarly, charity groups can raise children's sensation toward needy people.
On the contrary, children who learn individually might feel lonely and isolated. Although this method may increase self-reliance, freedom, and personal space, there is no room to improve socially-acquired characteristics. They might be exposed to inappropriate content for their age class if they are left unsupervised.
In my opinion, I believe that children's participation in group activities, especially with the same age class, has plenty of advantages for their mental and emotional well-being as well as can build new friendships and healthy rapport with others.
In conclusion, children would learn quickly and efficiently when they work in groups more than if they work alone. Parents should register them in such summer courses or sports teams to improve their abilities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, similarly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.83333333333 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17957943314 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.65873015873 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2103044596 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254021242598 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873074380609 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759450244145 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137662234245 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0802994148982 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.